Back to Top
Home / Article / What’s Holding Back Your Food Facility Upgrade and How to Overcome It!
What’s Holding Back Your Food Facility Upgrade and How to Overcome It!
What’s Holding Back Your Food Facility Upgrade and How to Overcome It!


In today’s competitive food manufacturing landscape, modernizing existing facilities isn’t just a luxury—it’s a necessity. Aging infrastructure, obsolete equipment, and evolving regulatory norms are forcing companies to reevaluate how they operate. Key reasons why upgrading is essential:


  • With ISO 22000:2018 and HACCP becoming baseline expectations, older facilities risk being flagged during audits, resulting in fines, product seizures, or shutdowns.
  • New equipment with PLC/SCADA integration, CIP systems, and energy-efficient drives can reduce downtime by 25–30%.
  • Modernizing layout and flow paths can cut material handling time by 20%, improving throughput and reducing contamination risk.
  • Upgraded refrigeration and HVAC can bring down energy costs by 20–35%.
  • Smart sensors and automation reduce product wastage by 15–25%, directly impacting bottom-line margins.


{Source: World Construction Today, ProFood World, PMMI Report 2023}


Common Pitfalls in Facility Upgrades


Many companies rush into upgrades without a structured plan. This often leads to more problems than progress. Here’s what many get wrong:


  • Inadequate Planning: No feasibility study or plant load analysis = budget leaks and redesigns midway.
  • Ignoring Regulatory Compliance: Overlooking GMP, HACCP, or ISO 22000 requirements causes non-conformities during audits.
  • Underestimating Downtime: Not planning for equipment replacement or rerouting utilities leads to prolonged shutdowns.
  • Neglecting Staff Training: New equipment and digital systems require skill upgrades that many teams aren’t ready for.


How Industry Leaders Handle Facility Upgrades Right


Top-tier companies in the food and beverage sector follow structured, data-driven upgrade models. Their success strategies include:


  • Technical Audits First: Mechanical, electrical, and process audits guide exact upgrade needs—preventing guesswork.
  • Phased Execution Plans: Upgrades aligned with low-production cycles or seasonal downtimes reduce business impact.
  • Automation & Robotics Integration: Pick-and-place systems, vision-based QC, and MIS integrations help cut labor costs while ensuring traceability and consistency.
  • Skilling & Change Management Programs: Staff Upskilling Programs to ensure workforce prepared for new operations and technologies.


From Assessment to Execution – Why PMG Is the Go-To for Food Facility Upgrades


At PMG, we recognize that upgrading a food facility is not just about replacing equipment—it's about re-engineering for compliance, efficiency, and future growth. We understand that every factory has unique needs based on layout, product type, hygiene zoning, and utility constraints.


Step 1: Comprehensive Site Audit & Gap Assessment


We begin with a multidisciplinary engineering audit, involving experts from process, utility, civil, electrical, and food safety domains. This isn’t just a checklist—it's a thorough evaluation of Existing infrastructure condition, Process flow and equipment adequacy, Regulatory compliance, Utility and energy efficiency and People capability and operational practices


A detailed Gap Assessment Report highlighting non-compliances, inefficiencies, and opportunities for improvement—each ranked by risk (probability × severity) to help prioritize actions based on business impact.


Step 2: Engineering Design Support for Smart Upgrades


Once gaps are identified, we move into solution development through a two-phase engineering approach.


First is Basic Design Phase where for every major audit observation, we prepare a concept-level solution, which includes:


·        Defined scope of work

·        Initial cost estimation

·        Implementation timeline

·        Potential operational impact


This high-level design allows clients to make informed decisions about which improvements to implement based on feasibility, ROI, and urgency.


Second is Execution Support Phase where for selected scopes from the Basic Design, PMG offers end-to-end support including:


·        Detailed Engineering (civil, mechanical, electrical, utility, food safety)

·        Procurement & Contracting assistance

·        Project Management with integrated scheduling and cost control

·        Construction Supervision to ensure execution matches design intent and standards


Why This Approach Works!


By combining technical assessments, risk-based prioritization, and detailed execution support, PMG ensures your facility upgrade is:


  • Compliant with food safety and regulatory norms
  • Efficient in layout, utility use, and process design
  • Scalable for future expansion
  • Economical, with smart investments and minimal disruption


We don’t just consult—we co-own your project goals, working as an engineering partner who treats your investment like our own.


Next Steps: Initiating a Future-Ready Upgrade


Ready to move forward but unsure where to start? Follow these actionable steps:


  1. Audit Your Facility to identify outdated systems, utilities, and process flow inefficiencies.
  2. Engage Engineering Experts who can analyze your layout, compliance gaps, and scale-up opportunities.
  3. Design the Upgrade Plan which should include timelines, validation procedures, cost estimates, and utility needs.
  4. Implement in Phases by prioritize upgrades based on impact—start with the bottlenecks.
  5. Train Your Team by using downtime for knowledge transfer and operational readiness.


Busting the Myths: What You Should Know


Even today, misconceptions about upgrading food facilities persist. Let's clarify a few:


  • Myth: "Upgrades mean full plant shutdowns."
  • Reality: With phased retrofitting and utility rerouting, core operations can often continue.
  • Myth: "Only new factories need to meet modern compliance norms."
  • Reality: Regardless of age, operation facilities must upgrade to meet today’s evolving standards.
  • Myth: "Hiring an external consultant is too expensive."
  • Reality: Inadequate planning or poor design without expert oversight typically results in 2x–3x cost escalation due to rework, delays, and regulatory non-compliance.
  • Myth: “Old equipment still works—it’s not worth replacing.”

Reality: Yes, it “works,” but how well? Newer systems offer 15–25% energy savings and 30% faster throughput.


Reference:


.   FSSAI – Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

·        FDA – Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)

·        EFSA – European Food Safety Authority

·        ISO 22000:2018 – Food Safety Management Systems

·        Food Safety Magazine – Recall Impact Studies

·        GMA-PwC Report – Capturing Recall Costs

·        ProFood World – Facility Upgrades and Efficiency

·        World Construction Today – Trends in Food Plant Upgrades

·        PMMI Business Intelligence Report – 2023 Equipment Trends

·        UNIDO – Energy Efficiency in Food Processing

·        McKinsey & Company – Smart Manufacturing in Food Industry

·        IFC / World Bank – Resource Efficiency in Agro-Industries

·        ASHRAE – HVAC Standards for Food Facilities

·        EHEDG – European Hygienic Engineering & Design Group

·        Codex Alimentarius – GMP & Food Hygiene Standards (WHO/FAO)

. Based on PMG project data and field experience

Featured Product Categories

Arrow

Featured Technology Categories

Arrow

Featured Expertise Categories

Arrow

Featured Projects

Arrow

Articles

Arrow

Newsletters

Arrow