Hygienic engineering isn’t just a compliance box to check; it’s a strategic investment. It is about protecting brand reputation, avoiding costly recalls, and ultimately, securing consumer trust. Below are five critical design mistakes that can lead to food safety risks and significant business loss. By recognizing and addressing these areas, any factory can reinforce a robust foundation for a safe and compliant food manufacturing environment.
1. Hygiene Zoning: Lack of Proper Segregation
Effective hygiene zoning in a food manufacturing plant involves carefully designing access points, strategically placing rooms, and implementing essential transitions like change rooms or anti-rooms. Missteps in this area can lead to contamination risks and impede effective sanitation. A well-thought-out zoning plan reduces these risks, improves sanitation effectiveness, and is a foundation of any hygienic design approach.
How to identify a Poor Hygiene Zoning?
Too Many Access Doors: Multiple access points can complicate contamination control, allowing potential allergens or harmful pathogens to enter sensitive areas.
Rooms Located Incorrectly: Critical rooms (e.g., washrooms, storage areas) positioned near production zones introduce cross-contamination risks.
Lack of Defined Clean and Dirty Zones: Without clear divisions, cross-traffic can easily introduce contaminants into production areas.
No Anti-Rooms or Change Rooms: Employees must change between street clothes and sanitized apparel. Without a designated area, risks of introducing contaminants multiply.
Unsegregated Raw and Processed Areas: When raw ingredients and finished products share adjacent spaces, the risk of contamination is elevated.
Insufficient Hygiene Control Points: Lack of handwashing and sanitation stations at critical transition points increases food safety risk.
2. Man and Material Movement
Mismanaged movement of personnel and materials can bring contaminants from non-sterile areas into production zones, compromising hygiene and increasing the likelihood of costly contamination incidents. Efficient flow and separation of personnel and material paths minimize contamination chances and enhance process efficiency. Some of the examples of Ineffective Man and Material Movement are:
Unrestricted Cross-Traffic: When employees and materials move freely between high-risk and low-risk areas, contamination spreads quickly.
No Designated Pathways for Personnel and Materials: Mixing material transport routes with employee paths leads to congestion and cross-contamination.
Absence of Sanitation Steps for High-Risk Zones: Not incorporating designated sanitation steps for employees and materials before entering high-risk zones is a missed critical control.
Lack of Flow Control from Entry to Exit: Without a defined direction, materials may backtrack or overlap paths, complicating contamination control.
Improper Storage Location for Raw and Finished Products: Storing raw materials too close to finished products elevates contamination risks.
Mixing Non-Sterile and Sterile Materials: Insufficient differentiation in how sterile and non-sterile materials are transported undermines hygiene efforts.
3. Lack of Air Controls: Compromised Air Quality and Pressure Differentials
Airborne contaminants can pose a serious risk in food manufacturing plants, especially if not managed with proper air filtration and pressure control. Implementing controlled airflow and ensuring pressure differentials between areas are crucial to keeping contamination under control and ensuring air quality remains safe.
Risks from Poor Air Controls:
Lack of Differential Pressure Between Rooms: Cross-contamination occurs when high-risk and low-risk areas share the same air pressure, allowing contaminants to travel freely.
Inadequate Filtration: Without high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, airborne particles from one area can easily spread to another.
Poor Ventilation in High-Risk Zones: Humidity and temperature control issues arise, fostering an environment conducive to microbial growth.
Improper Airflow Design: Incorrect airflow direction can carry contaminants from less controlled areas to critical zones.
Neglected Regular Air Testing and Filter Maintenance: Without regular inspections, the air system's effectiveness degrades, posing a persistent food safety risk.
4. Unhygienic Building Components: Poorly Selected or Maintained Materials
Materials in a food manufacturing plant need to be hygienic, non-porous, and easy to clean to prevent microbial growth and contamination. By selecting food-grade materials and regularly maintaining fixtures, management can minimize the risk of contamination from the building itself. Common Issues with Building Components:
Use of Porous Materials: Porous surfaces in production areas can harbor bacteria, making sanitation ineffective.
Corroded or Rust-Prone Fixtures: Exposed metal that corrodes can flake and introduce contaminants to food products.
Non-Food Grade Materials Used in Contact Areas: Using non-compliant materials in high-contact areas increases food contamination risks.
Deteriorating Seals and Joints: Cracks and gaps in building structures create breeding grounds for microbes.
Open, Exposed Wiring and Plumbing: Uncovered components not only complicate cleaning efforts but also pose food safety hazards.
5. Poor Finishing: Low-Quality Flooring, Walls, and Ceilings
Floors, walls, and ceilings must be designed to withstand regular cleaning and potential chemical exposure without harboring contaminants. Ensuring high-quality finishes for flooring, walls, and ceilings simplifies cleaning, reduces contamination risks, and contributes to a long-lasting hygienic environment
Examples of Poor Finishing Standards:
Cracked or Uneven Flooring: Hard-to-clean areas trap food particles and encourage bacterial growth.
Walls Not Resistant to Cleaning Chemicals: Non-compliant wall materials can degrade over time, becoming unsanitary and costly to repair.
Ceilings Susceptible to Mold Growth: Poor ventilation combined with non-moisture-resistant materials can cause mold, compromising air and food quality.
Inaccessible Corners and Joints: Rounded edges and smooth finishes help prevent dust buildup, whereas sharp corners trap debris.
Improperly Sealed Joints: Gaps at joints allow moisture and bacteria buildup, leading to sanitation failures.
Poorly Installed Drains: Faulty drainage can cause standing water, a serious hygiene hazard that encourages microbial growth.
Final Thought
Prioritizing hygienic engineering in food plant design isn’t just a regulatory requirement; it’s a strategic choice that protects the company’s bottom line, preserves brand reputation, and ensures consumer trust.
PMG stands for Projects Management Group. We provide world-class Engineering Services to build great food processing factories. 
Engineering is the difference between Chaos and Excellence. If you are going to do it, do it right. 
Explore the diverse range of Products in the Food Processing Industry. 
Explore the technologies at the heart of the the Food Processing Industry. 
Filter
